Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower could lead to many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly safe distance from cell tower is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.